{"id":1989,"date":"2017-11-27T09:04:24","date_gmt":"2017-11-27T14:04:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nypirg.org\/capitolperspective\/?p=1989"},"modified":"2017-11-27T09:04:24","modified_gmt":"2017-11-27T14:04:24","slug":"american-democracy-hits-a-new-low","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nypirg.org\/capitolperspective\/american-democracy-hits-a-new-low\/","title":{"rendered":"American Democracy Hits a New Low"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There has been a palpable decline in political ethics in America.\u00a0 What was once suspected \u2013 that elected officials could their trade policy positions for campaign contributions \u2013 has become more and more openly discussed.\u00a0 It\u2019s as if elected officials no longer see themselves as servants to the public, but instead as servants to the rich and powerful.<\/p>\n<p>Americans long suspected that this has been the case.\u00a0\u00a0 Poll after poll has shown that Democrats and Republicans agree on this key point.\u00a0 A poll in 2015 found that 84 percent of Americans think money has too much influence in political campaigns. Criticism of the role of political money cuts across party lines &#8211; large majorities of Republicans, Democrats, and independents all think money has too much influence.<\/p>\n<p>But now, to some extent as a result of recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions that have eroded prosecutors\u2019 ability to enforce anti-corruption laws, coupled with the obvious disdain that the President shows toward acceptable ethical standards, members of Congress are now openly admitting that their policy positions are directly connected to the wishes of their campaign donors, even if the public disagrees.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier in the year, the evidence was based on the effort to repeal federal health insurance coverage.\u00a0 Key Republican operatives concerned about their party\u2019s midterm re-election push were warned that donors were refusing to contribute until the Congressional majorities produced victories.\u00a0 In one private meeting, it was reported that \u201cDonors are furious.\u201d \u00a0These donors were not concerned that millions of Americans would lose their health care coverage and that some would get unnecessarily sick, instead they were \u201cfurious\u201d because Congressional Republicans haven\u2019t kept their promise to eliminate insurance coverage.<\/p>\n<p>In another reported example, a prominent Republican donor stated that the \u201cDallas piggy bank\u201d was closed until there is progress on health care repeal and tax cuts. The donor was reported as saying, \u201cGet [health care repeal and tax reform] done and we\u2019ll open [fundraising] back up.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Now it\u2019s the so-called tax reform bill.\u00a0 After a private meeting of Republican Senators, Sen. Lindsey Graham told an NBC reporter \u201cfinancial contributions will stop\u201d if tax reform does not pass.<\/p>\n<p>Even one of New York\u2019s Congressional Republicans, Representative Collins from the Buffalo area was reported to have said, \u201cMy donors are basically saying, \u2018Get [tax reform] done or don\u2019t ever call me again.\u201d\u2019<\/p>\n<p>While it\u2019s no surprise that campaign contributors expect that their donations will influence elected officials, it is nothing short of shocking that public officials are being so open about how they transact policymaking.<\/p>\n<p>Reports that the various tax reform plans are nothing more than tax cuts for wealthy individuals and large businesses, have eroded the popularity of the plan.\u00a0 A poll released by the Wall Street Journal\/NBC News found that only 25 percent of Americans said\u00a0the tax reform\/cut plan was \u201cgood idea.\u201d\u00a0(A solid majority of American also support the Affordable Care Act.)<\/p>\n<p>But the eroding popularity of these ideas hasn\u2019t reduced the pressure from the donor class.\u00a0 Instead the political calculus appears to be to deliver for the political contributors now, raise big bucks for campaign warchests and try to take some of the sting out of these moves in advance of the midterm elections next year.<\/p>\n<p>The nasty \u2013 and transactional nature \u2013 of American politics is taking its toll.\u00a0 Recent polls find Americans increasingly unhappy with the direction of the country.\u00a0 In one, 70 percent said the nation is facing its widest political divide since the Vietnam War.<\/p>\n<p>This month\u2019s Washington Post-University of Maryland poll\u00a0revealed voters\u2019 deeply depressing view of U.S. politics, widespread distrust of the nation\u2019s political leaders and their ability to compromise, and an erosion of pride in the way democracy works in America.<\/p>\n<p>What has become clear is that elected officials\u2019 disregard for ethics, their increasingly brazen actions to transact policy for campaign donations, and public demands from the rich and powerful for action is taking its toll \u2013 not only on unpopular Congressional actions, but an erosion of public support for democracy itself.<\/p>\n<p>That has to change and soon.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There has been a palpable decline in political ethics in America.\u00a0 What was once suspected \u2013 that elected officials could their trade policy positions for campaign contributions \u2013 has become more and more openly discussed.\u00a0 It\u2019s as if elected officials no longer see themselves as servants to the public, but instead as servants to the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1989","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nypirg.org\/capitolperspective\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1989","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nypirg.org\/capitolperspective\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nypirg.org\/capitolperspective\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nypirg.org\/capitolperspective\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nypirg.org\/capitolperspective\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1989"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nypirg.org\/capitolperspective\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1989\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1990,"href":"https:\/\/www.nypirg.org\/capitolperspective\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1989\/revisions\/1990"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nypirg.org\/capitolperspective\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1989"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nypirg.org\/capitolperspective\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1989"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nypirg.org\/capitolperspective\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1989"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}