Memorial Day weekend marks the unofficial start of summer. Bar-B-Qs, picnics, vacationing, Americans will want to be outdoors. And at events large and small, in parks or backyards, Americans bring with them the foods and beverages that are easiest to transport. When it comes to beverages, coolers full of soft drinks, beer and wine are often the drinks of choice. For most, that means single use beverage containers consumed, in plastics or glass bottles, or aluminum cans. And, of course, this collection of containers requires disposal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But where?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When it comes to single use beverage containers, some are returned to the manufacturer<\/em> (for example Pepsi) to be recycled or otherwise disposed of. And many others end up dumped in landfills or incinerators at your<\/em> expense.<\/p>\n\n\n\n When one examines which beverage containers are returned or which are dumped, there is really no rhyme or reason. For example, the next time you\u2019re looking at soft drink beverages, \u201cMountain Dew\u201d is likely recycled, while \u201cBrisk Iced Tea\u201d is not. Both are in identical plastic bottles and both are made by PepsiCo, but their disposal is handled differently.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But why? The answer is that it\u2019s a quirk of New York law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n New York\u2019s \u201cBottle Bill\u201d is the law<\/a> that requires consumers to place a nickel deposit for the purchase of a covered beverage container. That law covers carbonated beverages and water containers but does not<\/em> cover anything else. So, soda and beer are in, while iced teas and sports drinks are out. Which means that the beverage companies that produce beer, soda and water are responsible for disposal of returned used containers, while taxpayers are on the hook for the disposal of everything else.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Identical containers being treated differently. It might be humorous, but it contributes to New York\u2019s solid waste crisis. Right now, the number<\/a> one place that residential trash goes to is a landfill; number two is export for disposal; number three is burning; and the last is to be recycled. To make matters worse, the state\u2019s residential recycling rate has been dropping<\/a> over the past decade. So you pay for more landfilling and burning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The state\u2019s capacity to tackle this problem is dwindling. According<\/a> to the state Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), \u201cNew York\u2019s 25 municipal solid waste landfills have a combined landfill capacity of between 16 and 25 years.\u201d If the state\u2019s landfills are filled to capacity in a decade or so, what will happen?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two and a half years ago<\/em> the DEC issued its \u201cNew York State Solid Waste Management Plan<\/a>\u201d to tackle that emerging problem. Among its recommendations, the DEC argued that the state should reduce or recycle its solid wastes at the rate of 85 percent<\/a> and do so by embracing a \u201ccircular economy\u201d approach, one that relies on ensuring that the producer<\/em> of the waste is responsible for its fate \u2013 not<\/em> the taxpayers. The plan urged action to, among other things, expand<\/a> the state\u2019s bottle deposit law and reduce packaging wastes<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So far, however, nothing has been done. The expected budget agreement is unlikely to tackle this problem and so the garbage will keep piling up \u2013 and used beverage containers will either get recycled or dumped in a landfill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n