 |
A SURVEY OF CONDITIONS
AT THE POLLS IN NEW YORK CITY
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
NOVEMBER 2, 2004
A NYPIRG Report ________________
I. Introduction
Table 1: Survey Highlights
II. Summary of Findings
III. Detailed Findings
IV. Background
V. The Report
VI. Recommendations
Appendices
Credits
Press Release |
 |
 |
Table 1
| Table One: Survey Highlights |
- Our Voter Agony Index found that 13% of voters surveyed experienced an "agonizing" problem at the polls such as a broken machine or chaotic poll site. In our survey, Manhattan fared worst on the Agony Index with 19% of voters reporting a major problem. Staten Island and Queens fared best at 7%.
- Forty five percent of Board of Elections' Poll Site Coordinators surveyed failed to correctly answer questions about new identification requirements required of certain voters.
- Six percent of voters surveyed were unjustly asked to produce identification at the polls on November 2 nd.
- Five percent of voters surveyed relayed to surveyors that, while properly registered, they did not find their name in the poll books on November 2 nd.
- Nearly half of all voters surveyed (48.6%) reported that Board of Elections workers failed to ask if they needed help in operating the voting machine, in violation of Board policy.
- While 93% of voters surveyed described their poll sites as either "calm and quiet" or "busy & orderly," 7% of voters described their polling sites as either "confusing" or "chaotic."
- Poll workers did a good job distributing paper (Affidavit) ballots to voters. Virtually all voters surveyed were offered this option if problems arose with their registrations.
|
next>>
|  |